(THESIS) – FAULKNER´S STYLE - A LECTURE ON STREAM-OF-CONSCIOUSNESS - Manoel Ferreira
III PART
The technique
of interior monologues is replace by a precise, external realism. The author
evokes the outer appearance of things with magnificent approximation; current
reality glows unexectedly in colors a mere copyist of nature could never find
because he sees only the smaller side of the world. A blossoming pear tree; a
black staircase with its splash of light from a Grey window; old, unshapen
Negro woman clutching a hotwater bottle "by the neck lie a dead hen."
how alive these things are!
Faulkner
often piles up words in a way that brings the charge prolixity. He has
willbourne say of his life with Charlote in chicago.
"It has
the mausoleum of love, it was the stinking catafalque of the dead corpse borne
between the alfactoryless walking shapes of the immortal unsentient demand
ancient meat."
Nevertheless,
despite the blunders and despite the habits and the willful bad writing (and
willful it obviously is), the style as a whole is extraordinarily effective;
the reader does remain immersed, wants to remain immersed, and it is
interesting to look onto the reason for this. And at once, if one considers
these queer sentences not simply by themselves, as monsters of grammar or
awkwardness, but in their relation to the book as a whole, one sees a functional
reason and necessity for their being as they are. Obviously, we need to remain
and remember it´s the very needed not to think as we are able to do it, that´s
to say, we think about how Faulkner´s characters are, we need to think as they
do. They parallel in a curious and perhaps inevitable way, and not without
aesthetic justification, the whole elaborate method of deliberately meaning, of
progressive and partial and delayed disclosery, which so often gives the
characteristic shape to the novels themselves. It is a persistent offering
ofobstacles, a calculated system of screens and obtrusions, of confusions and
ambiguous interpolations and delays, with one express purpose; and that purpose
is simply to keep the form - and the idea - fluid and unfinished, still in
motion, as it were, and unknown, until the dropping into place of the very last
syllable. Another purpose is simply to make one enters into his soul
considering time.
However,
those above word series, while conspicuous at times, may have a place in a style
as minutely analytical as Faulkner´s. In their typical form they are not
redundant, however elaborate, and sometimes their cumulative effect is
undeniable - for example, the
"long
still hot weary dead September afternoon..."
when Quentin
listens to Miss Rosa´s story. Colonel Feinman, the wealthy exploiter of
impecunious aviators, had as secretary
"a young
man, in horn rim glasses..."
who spoke
"with a
kind of silken insolense, like the pampered intelligent eunuchmountebank of an
eastern despot..."
and there the
amplification redounds to the significance of the whole scene. Quite often,,
too, these series of words, while seemingly extravagant, are a remarkably
compressed rendering, as in the phrase "pazzionate tragic ephemeral loves
of adolescence.
But for the
flexibility, the continuous beat of the phrase would grow monotonous - with its
inversions and parentheses, and the dream like quality of its (again the sense
of timlessness) often threatening to make the skill of its complex delivery too
apparent, which would be fatal. But always at the right moment there comes
pause the break of dialogue - and Faulkner´s dialogue surpasses itself - he
added information when it´s needed. or the image in a new light subtly changing
the texture or the posturing of a character, as sudden as the shock of the
tragic mask.
---------------------------
Notes
1 - Though to
"look onto" has almost the same meaning of "to look into",
in Faulkner´s style it´s better to say "look onto", have a view of
somewhere.
2 - It´s
needed to have the very glance at Faulkner´s great ontology as Sartre describes
"Nothinglessness".
3 -
Certainly, the structure of both language is different. But we do need do
consider the idea of "Bad faith" in Sartre´s Existencial Psychoanalyse.
On the other hand, Sartre has never worried about "Language". That´s
why he has no conception of the future.
------------------------------
Manoel Ferreira Neto.
Comentários
Postar um comentário